교황 성하, 韓半島의 北韓 核武器 實驗 繼續
및 各國 武器 密去來에 警鍾, 武器 非核化 勞力 闡明,
Holy Father, spoke denuclearization,,,,
글 : Msgr. Byon
프란치스코 교황 성하, 한반도의 북한핵무기 실험 계속과
각국의 세계 도처 무기 거래에 경종을,,,
-2017년 1월 9일, 프란치스코 교황 성하께서 새 해 교황청의 180여명에 달하는
전 세계 각국에서 활약하고 있는 외교 사절단과의 신년 만남에서,
비핵화를 위한 교황청의 노력을 알리시며,,,.-
------------------------------------------------
Pope Francis Activities
프란치스코 교황 성하, 한반도의 북한핵무기 실험 계속과
각국의 세계 도처 무기 거래에 경종, 등을,,,
-2017년 1월 9일, 프란치스코 교황 성하께서 새 해 교황청의 180여명에 달하는
전 세계 각국에서 활약하고 있는 외교 사절단과의 신년 만남에서,
비핵화를 위한 교황청의 노력을 알리시며,,,.-
Pope Francis Speeches :
Pope Francis: New Year's address to Diplomatic Corps
(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis on Monday appealed to all religious authorities to join in “reaffirming unequivocally that one can never kill in God’s name,” saying the world is “dealing with a homicidal madness which misuses God’s name in order to disseminate death, in a play for domination and power.”
The Holy Father was giving his annual address to the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See. “Fundamentalist terrorism is the fruit of a profound spiritual poverty, and often is linked to significant social poverty,” – the Pope said – “It can only be fully defeated with the joint contribution of religious and political leaders.”
Click here for our report on the Pope's address.
The full text of the Holy Father's address to the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See may be found in official English translation below
*********************************************************
ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE DIPLOMATIC CORPS
Monday, 9 January 2017
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE DIPLOMATIC CORPS
Monday, 9 January 2017
Your Excellencies, dear Ambassadors,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I offer you a cordial welcome. I thank you for your presence in such numbers at this traditional gathering, which permits us to exchange greetings and good wishes that the year just beginning will be for everyone a time of joy, prosperity and peace. I express particular gratitude to the Dean of the Diplomatic Corps, His Excellency Armindo Fernandes do Espírito Santo Vieira, the Ambassador of Angola, for his courteous greetings on behalf of the entire Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See, which has recently been enlarged following the establishment of diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Mauritania a month ago. I likewise express my gratitude to the many Ambassadors resident in Rome, whose number has grown this past year, and to the non-resident Ambassadors, whose presence today is a clear sign of the bonds of friendship uniting their peoples to the Holy See. At the same time, I would like to express heartfelt condolences to the Ambassador of Malaysia for the death of his predecessor, Dato’ Mohd Zulkephli Bin Mohd Noor, who passed away last February.
In the course of the past year, relations between your countries and the Holy See were further consolidated, thanks to the welcome visit of many Heads of State and Government, also in conjunction with the numerous events of the recently concluded Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy. So too, a variety of bilateral Agreements were signed or ratified, both those of a general nature aimed at recognizing the Church’s juridical status, with the Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, Benin and Timor East, and those of a more specific character, the Avenant signed with France, the Convention on fiscal matters with the Republic of Italy, recently entered into force, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the Secretariat of State and the Government of the United Arab Emirates. Furthermore, in the context of the Holy See’s commitment to the obligations assumed by the aforementioned Agreements, the Comprehensive Agreement with the State of Palestine, which took effect a year ago, was fully implemented.
Dear Ambassadors,
A century ago, we were in the midst of the First World War. A “useless slaughter”,[1] in which new methods of warfare sowed death and caused immense suffering to the defenceless civil population. In 1917, the conflict changed profoundly, taking on increasingly global proportions, while those totalitarian regimes, which were long to be a cause of bitter divisions, began to appear on the horizon. A hundred years later, it can be said that many parts of the world have benefited from lengthy periods of peace, which have favoured opportunities for economic development and unprecedented prosperity. For many people today, peace appears as a blessing to be taken for granted, for all intents an acquired right to which not much thought is given. Yet, for all too many others, peace remains merely a distant dream. Millions of people still live in the midst of senseless conflicts. Even in places once considered secure, a general sense of fear is felt. We are frequently overwhelmed by images of death, by the pain of innocent men, women and children who plead for help and consolation, by the grief of those mourning the loss of a dear one due to hatred and violence, and by the drama of refugees fleeing war and migrants meeting tragic deaths.
For this reason, I would like to devote today’s meeting to the theme of security and peace. In today’s climate of general apprehension for the present, and uncertainty and anxious concern for the future, I feel it is important to speak a word of hope, which can also indicate a path on which to embark.
Just a few days ago, we celebrated the Fiftieth World Day of Peace, instituted by my blessed predecessor Paul VI “as a hope and as a promise, at the beginning of the calendar which measures and describes the path of human life in time, that peace with its just and beneficent equilibrium may dominate the development of events to come”.[2] For Christians, peace is a gift of the Lord, proclaimed in song by the Angels at the moment of Christ’s birth: “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace among those whom he favours” (Lk 2:14). Peace is a positive good, “the fruit of the right ordering of things” with which God has invested human society;[3] it is “more than the absence of war”.[4] Nor can it be “reduced to the maintenance of a balance of power between opposing forces”.[5] Rather, it demands the commitment of those persons of good will who “thirst for an ever more perfect reign of justice”.[6]
In this regard, I voice my firm conviction that every expression of religion is called to promote peace. I saw this clearly in the World Day of Prayer for Peace held in Assisi last September, during which the representatives of the different religions gathered to “give voice together to all those who suffer, to all those who have no voice and are not heard”,[7] as well as in my visits to the Synagogue of Rome and the Mosque in Baku.
We know that there has been no shortage of acts of religiously motivated violence, beginning with Europe itself, where the historical divisions between Christians have endured all too long. In my recent visit to Sweden, I mentioned the urgent need for healing past wounds and journeying together towards common goals. The basis of that journey can only be authentic dialogue between different religious confessions. Such dialogue is possible and necessary, as I wished to show by my meeting in Cuba with Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, as well as by my Apostolic Journeys to Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, where I sensed the rightful aspiration of those peoples to resolve conflicts which for years have threatened social harmony and peace.
At the same time, it is fitting that we not overlook the great number of religiously inspired works that contribute, at times with the sacrifice of martyrs, to the pursuit of the common good through education and social assistance, especially in areas of great poverty and in theatres of conflict. These efforts advance peace and testify that individuals of different nationalities, cultures and traditions can indeed live and work together, provided that the dignity of the human person is placed at the centre of their activities.
Sadly, we are conscious that even today, religious experience, rather than fostering openness to others, can be used at times as a pretext for rejection, marginalization and violence. I think particularly of the fundamentalist-inspired terrorism that in the past year has also reaped numerous victims throughout the world: in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Egypt, France, Germany, Jordan, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, the United States of America, Tunisia and Turkey. These are vile acts that use children to kill, as in Nigeria, or target people at prayer, as in the Coptic Cathedral of Cairo, or travellers or workers, as in Brussels, or passers-by in the streets of cities like Nice and Berlin, or simply people celebrating the arrival of the new year, as in Istanbul.
We are dealing with a homicidal madness which misuses God’s name in order to disseminate death, in a play for domination and power. Hence I appeal to all religious authorities to join in reaffirming unequivocally that one can never kill in God’s name. Fundamentalist terrorism is the fruit of a profound spiritual poverty, and often is linked to significant social poverty. It can only be fully defeated with the joint contribution of religious and political leaders. The former are charged with transmitting those religious values which do not separate fear of God from love of neighbour. The latter are charged with guaranteeing in the public forum the right to religious freedom, while acknowledging religion’s positive and constructive contribution to the building of a civil society that sees no opposition between social belonging, sanctioned by the principle of citizenship, and the spiritual dimension of life. Government leaders are also responsible for ensuring that conditions do not exist that can serve as fertile terrain for the spread of forms of fundamentalism. This calls for suitable social policies aimed at combating poverty; such policies cannot prescind from a clear appreciation of the importance of the family as the privileged place for growth in human maturity, and from a major investment in the areas of education and culture.
In this regard, I was interested to learn of the Council of Europe’s initiative on the religious dimension of intercultural dialogue, which in the past year discussed the role of education in preventing radicalization leading to terrorism and extremist violence. This represents an occasion for a better understanding of the role of religion and education in bringing about the authentic social harmony needed for coexistence in a multicultural society.
Here I would express my conviction that political authorities must not limit themselves to ensuring the security of their own citizens – a concept which could easily be reduced to a mere “quiet life” – but are called also to work actively for the growth of peace. Peace is an “active virtue”, once that calls for the engagement and cooperation of each individual and society as a whole. As the Second Vatican Council observed, “peace will never be achieved once and for all, but must be built up continually”,[8] by safeguarding the good of persons and respecting their dignity. Peacemaking requires above all else renouncing violence in vindicating one’s rights.[9] To this very principle I devoted my Message for the 2017 World Day of Peace, with the title, “Nonviolence: a Style of Politics for Peace”. I wished primarily to reaffirm that nonviolence is a political style based on the rule of law and the dignity of each person.
Peacemaking also demands that “those causes of discord which lead to wars be rooted out”,[10] beginning with acts of injustice. Indeed, justice and peace are intimately linked[11]. Yet, as Saint John Paul II observed, “because human justice is always fragile and imperfect, subject as it is to the limitations and egoism of individuals and groups, it must include and, as it were, be completed by the forgiveness that heals and rebuilds human relations from their foundations… Forgiveness is in no way opposed to justice. It is rather the fullness of justice, leading to that tranquillity of order” which involves “the deepest healing of the wounds which fester in human hearts. Justice and forgiveness are both essential to such healing”.[12] Those words remain most timely, and met with openness on the part of some Heads of State or Government to my request to make a gesture of clemency towards the incarcerated. To them, and to all those who promote dignified living conditions for prisoners and their reintegration into society, I would like to express my particular appreciation and gratitude.
I am convinced that for many people the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy was an especially fruitful moment for rediscovering “mercy’s immense positive influence as a social value”.[13] In this way, everyone can help bring about “a culture of mercy, based on the rediscovery of encounter with others, a culture in which no one looks at another with indifference or turns away from the suffering of our brothers and sisters”.[14] Only thus will it be possible to build societies that are open and welcoming towards foreigners and at the same time internally secure and at peace. This is all the more needed at the present time, when massive waves of migration continue in various parts of the world. I think in a special way of the great numbers of displaced persons and refugees in some areas of Africa and Southeast Asia, and all those who are fleeing areas of conflict in the Middle East.
Last year the international community gathered at two important events convened by the United Nations: the first World Humanitarian Summit and the Summit for Refugees and Migrants. With regard to migrants, displaced persons and refugees, a common commitment is needed, one focused on offering them a dignified welcome. This would involve respecting the right of “every human being… to emigrate to other countries and take up residence there”,[15] while at the same time ensuring that migrants can be integrated into the societies in which they are received without the latter sensing that their security, cultural identity and political-social stability are threatened. On the other hand, immigrants themselves must not forget that they have a duty to respect the laws, culture and traditions of the countries in which they are received.
Prudence on the part of public authorities does not mean enacting policies of exclusion vis-à-vis migrants, but it does entail evaluating, with wisdom and foresight, the extent to which their country is in a position, without prejudice to the common good of citizens, to offer a decent life to migrants, especially those truly in need of protection. Above all, the current crisis should not be reduced to a simple matter of numbers. Migrants are persons, with their own names, stories and families. There can never be true peace as long as a single human being is violated in his or her personal identity and reduced to a mere statistic or an object of economic calculation.
The issue of migration is not one that can leave some countries indifferent, while others are left with the burden of humanitarian assistance, often at the cost of notable strain and great hardship, in the face of an apparently unending emergency. All should feel responsible for jointly pursuing the international common good, also through concrete gestures of human solidarity; these are essential building-blocks of that peace and development which entire nations and millions of people still await. So I am grateful to the many countries which offer a generous welcome to those in need, beginning with various European nations, particularly Italy, Germany, Greece and Sweden.
I vividly remember my visit to the island of Lesvos in the company of my brothers Patriarch Bartholomew and Archbishop Ieronymos. There I saw at first hand the dramatic situation of the refugee camps, but also the goodness and spirit of service shown by the many persons committed to assisting those living there. Nor should we overlook the welcome offered by other countries of Europe and the Middle East, such as Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, as well as the commitment of various African and Asian countries. In the course of my visit to Mexico, where I experienced the joy of the Mexican people, I likewise felt close to the thousands of migrants from Central America who, in their attempt to find a better future, endure terrible injustices and dangers, victims of extortion and objects of that deplorable trade – that horrible form of modern slavery – which is human trafficking.
One enemy of peace is a “reductive vision” of the human person, which opens the way to the spread of injustice, social inequality and corruption. With regard to this last phenomenon, the Holy See has taken on new commitments with its formal adherence, on 19 September last, to the United Nations Convention against Corruption, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 31 October 2003.
In his encyclical Populorum Progressio, issued fifty years ago, Blessed Paul VI noted how such situations of inequality provoke conflict. As he stated, “civil progress and economic development are the only road to peace”,[16] which public authorities have the duty to encourage and foster by creating conditions for a more equitable distribution of resources and by generating employment opportunities, especially for young people. In today’s world, all too many people, especially children, still suffer from endemic poverty and live in conditions of food insecurity – indeed, hunger – even as natural resources are the object of greedy exploitation by a few, and enormous amounts of food are wasted daily.
Children and young people are the future; it is for them that we work and build. They cannot be selfishly overlooked or forgotten. As I stated recently in a letter addressed to all bishops, I consider it a priority to protect children, whose innocence is often violated by exploitation, clandestine and slave labour, prostitution or the abuse of adults, criminals and dealers in death.[17]
During my visit to Poland for World Youth Day, I encountered thousands of young people full of life and enthusiasm. Yet in many of them I also saw pain and suffering. I think of the young people affected by the brutal conflict in Syria, deprived of the joys of childhood and youth, such as the ability to play games and to attend school. My constant thoughts are with them and the beloved Syrian people. I appeal to the international community to make every effort to encourage serious negotiations for an end to the conflict, which is causing a genuine human catastrophe. Each of the parties must give priority to international humanitarian law, and guarantee the protection of civilians and needed humanitarian aid for the populace. Our common aspiration is that the recently signed truce will be a sign of hope for the whole Syrian people, so greatly in need of it.
This also means working for the elimination of the deplorable arms trade and the never-ending race to create and spread ever more sophisticated weaponry. Particularly disturbing are the experiments being conducted on the Korean Peninsula, which destabilize the entire region and raise troubling questions for the entire international community about the risk of a new nuclear arms race. The words of Saint John XXIII in Pacem in Terris continue to ring true: “Justice, right reason and the recognition of human dignity cry out insistently for a cessation to the arms race. The stockpiles of armaments which have been built up in various countries must be reduced all round by the parties concerned. Nuclear weapons must be banned”.[18] In the light of this, and in view of the forthcoming Conference on Disarmament, the Holy See seeks to promote an ethics of peace and security that goes beyond that fear and “closure” which condition the debate on nuclear weapons.
Also with regard to conventional weapons, we need to acknowledge that easy access to the sale of arms, including those of small calibre, not only aggravates various conflicts, but also generates a widespread sense of insecurity and fear. This is all the more dangerous in times, like our own, of social uncertainty and epochal changes.
Another enemy of peace is the ideology that exploits social unrest in order to foment contempt and hate, and views others as enemies to be eliminated. Sadly, new ideologies constantly appear on the horizon of humanity. Under the guise of promising great benefits, they instead leave a trail of poverty, division, social tensions, suffering and, not infrequently, death. Peace, on the other hand, triumphs through solidarity. It generates the desire for dialogue and cooperation which finds an essential instrument in diplomacy. Mercy and solidarity inspire the convinced efforts of the Holy See and the Catholic Church to avert conflicts and to accompany processes of peace, reconciliation and the search for negotiated solutions. It is heartening that some of these attempts have met with the good will of many people who, from a number of quarters, have actively and fruitfully worked for peace. I think of the efforts made in the last two years for rapprochement between Cuba and the United States. I think also of the persevering efforts made, albeit not without difficulty, to end years of conflict in Colombia.
That approach aims at encouraging reciprocal trust, supporting processes of dialogue and emphasizing the need for courageous gestures. These are quite urgent in neighbouring Venezuela, where the effects of the political, social and economic crisis have long burdened the civil population. So too in other parts of the world, beginning with the Middle East, a similar approach is needed, not only to bring an end to the Syrian conflict, but also to foster fully reconciled societies in Iraq and in Yemen. The Holy See renews its urgent appeal for the resumption of dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians towards a stable and enduring solution that guarantees the peaceful coexistence of two states within internationally recognized borders. No conflict can become a habit impossible to break. Israelis and Palestinians need peace. The whole Middle East urgently needs peace!
I also express my hope that there will be a full implementation of the agreements aimed at restoring peace in Libya, where it is imperative to reconcile the divisions of recent years. I likewise encourage every effort on the local and international level to renew peaceful civil coexistence in Sudan and South Sudan, and in the Central African Republic, all plagued by ongoing armed conflicts, massacres and destruction, as well as in other African nations marked by tensions and political and social instability. In particular, I express my hope that the recently-signed agreement in the Democratic Republic of Congo may help enable political leaders to work diligently to pursue reconciliation and dialogue between all elements of civil society. My thoughts also turn to Myanmar, that efforts will be made to foster peaceful co-existence and, with the support of the international community, to provide assistance to those in grave and pressing need.
In Europe too, where tensions also exist, openness to dialogue is the only way to ensure the security and development of the continent. Consequently, I welcome those initiatives favouring the process of reunification in Cyprus, where negotiations resume today, and I express my hope that in Ukraine viable solutions will continue to be pursued with determination in order to fulfil the commitments undertaken by the parties involved and, above all, that a prompt response will be given to the humanitarian situation, which remains grave.
Europe as a whole is experiencing a decisive moment in its history, one in which it is called to rediscover its proper identity. This requires recovering its roots in order to shape its future. In response to currents of divisiveness, it is all the more urgent to update “the idea of Europe”, so as to give birth to a new humanism based on the capacity to integrate, dialogue and generate[19] that made the “Old Continent” great. The process of European unification, begun after the Second World War, continues to be a unique opportunity for stability, peace and solidarity between peoples. On this occasion, I can only reaffirm the interest and concern of the Holy See for Europe and its future, conscious that the values that were the inspiration and basis of that project, which this year celebrates its sixtieth anniversary, are values common to the entire continent and transcend the borders of the European Union itself.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
To build peace also means to work actively for the care of creation. The Paris Agreement on the climate, which recently took effect, is an important sign of the shared commitment to bequeath a more beautiful and livable world to those who will come after us. It is my hope that the efforts made in recent times to respond to climate change will meet with increased cooperation on the part of all, for the earth is our common home and we need to realize that the choices of each have consequences for all.
Clearly, however, certain phenomena go beyond the possibilities of human intervention. I refer to the numerous earthquakes which have struck some areas of the world. I think especially of those in Ecuador, Italy and Indonesia, which has claimed numerous victims and left many others in conditions of great insecurity. I was able to visit personally some of the areas affected by the earthquake in central Italy. In addition to seeing the damage done to a land rich in art and culture, I shared the pain of many people, but I also witnessed their courage and their determination to rebuild what was destroyed. I pray that the solidarity which united the beloved Italian people in the days after the earthquake will continue to inspire the entire nation, particularly at this delicate time in its history. The Holy See and Italy are particularly close for obvious historical, cultural and geographical reasons. This relationship was evident in the Jubilee Year, and I thank all the Italian authorities for their help in organizing this event and ensuring the security of pilgrims from all over the world.
Dear Ambassadors,
Peace is a gift, a challenge and a commitment. It is a gift because it flows from the very heart of God. It is a challenge because it is a good that can never be taken for granted and must constantly be achieved. It is a commitment because it demands passionate effort on the part of all people of goodwill to seek and build it. For true peace can only come about on the basis of a vision of human beings capable of promoting an integral development respectful of their transcendent dignity. As Blessed Paul VI observed, “development is the new name for peace”.[20]
This, then, is my prayerful hope for the year just begun: that our countries and their peoples may find increased opportunities to work together in building true peace. For its part, the Holy See, and the Secretariat of State in particular, will always be ready to cooperate with those committed to ending current conflicts and to offer support and hope to all who suffer.
In the Church’s liturgy, we greet one another with the words: “Peace be with you”. With this same greeting, as a pledge of abundant divine blessings, I renew to each of you, distinguished members of the Diplomatic Corps, to your families and to the countries you represent, my heartfelt good wishes for the New Year.
Thank you.
[1] BENEDICT XV, Letter to the Leaders of the Peoples at War (1 August 1917): AAS 9 (1917), 421.
[2] Message for the Celebration of the First World Day of Peace (1 January 1968).
[3] SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (7 December 1965), 78.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Address at the World Day of Prayer for Peace, Assisi, 20 September 2016.
[8] Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 78.
[9] Cf. ibid.
[10] Ibid., 83.
[11] Cf. Ps 85:11 and Is 32:17.
[12] Message for the Thirty-fifth World Day of Peace: There is no Peace without Justice, There is no Justice without Forgiveness (1 January 2002), 3.
[13] Apostolic Letter Misericordia et Misera (20 November 2016), 18.
[14] Ibid., 20.
[15] JOHN XXIII, Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris (11 April 1963), 25.
[16] Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio (26 March 1967), 83.
[17] Cf. Letter to Bishops on the Feast of the Holy Innocents, 28 December 2016.
[18] Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris, 112.
[19] Cf. Address at the Conferral of the Charlemagne Prize, 6 May 2016.
[20] Cf. Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio, 87.
입력 : 2017.01.10
Copyright ⓒ 변기영 몬시뇰 사랑방 Servant Hall of Msgr. Byon 무단전재 및 재배포 금지
------------------------------
韓民族의集團自爆 !?서울은 불바다!? 평양은 잿터미!?[파리 평화협정]과 월남 패망사! Denuclearization Movement of war weapon ! |
오늘의 人類는 세계 도처에서 서로 크고 작은 집단학살(集團虐殺)을 일삼다가 마침내 집단자살(集團自殺)의 수단으로 집단자폭(集團自爆)으로 가고 있는 것이 아닌가 ? !
기도합시다 ! 더구나 중국이 평화협정을 또 내세운다니,!
1973년 [파리 평화협정]과 미군철수로 시작된, 1975년 [월남 패망]을 되새겨 봅시다!
1945년 8월 5일, 원자폭탄 투하 직후의 일본 히로시마 모습!!.
서울을 불바다로?! 평양은 잿터미로?! 삼천리 강산에 [새마을 운동]으로 건설한 문화를, [헌마을 운동]으로 재터미를 만드는 사상과 정신은 무엇인가 !!? 서울을 불바다로!? 평양은 잿터미로!? 폭탄으로 누구를 위해서 무엇하러 통일해야 하나 !? 정복이나 점령으로는 합병이나 합방(合邦)이지, 통일이 아니다. 진정한 통일은 양쪽 동포들의 합리적인 윤리적 가치관의 일치가 선행되어야 한다.
서울을 불바다로? 그럼, 평양도 잿더미로?! [서울이 불바다]가 되면, [평양도 잿더미]가 되지 않을 수 없다는데! 미국만 믿고, 중국에도 기대보며,,,! 나름대로 이해와 협력과 인내로 남북한의 신뢰를 구축하려 했지만 ! 이는 상대가 어불성설(語不成說)로, 언어도단(言語道斷)이라서, 마이동풍(馬耳東風)이고, 우이독경(牛耳讀經)이니, 하루라도 신앙으로 살면서 한마디 나라 위한 기도라도 바치기를 어찌 소홀할 수 있읍니까?!! <對面共話, 心隔一千山>
"미국을 믿지 말고, 소련한테 속지 말고, 일본은 일어난다. 조선아 조심해라!" 이 말은 1945년 해방 후, 親中容共 사상이 있던 당시 申不出(?)이라는 만담가가 하던 소리로, 서울의 동대문과 남대문에 대자보까지 써붙였던 말로 전해지고 있읍니다. 1950년 6.25 사변 발발 불과 몇일 전까지, 요사이처럼 북한은 남북 평화협상을 계속 제기하였었는데, 당시 표현으로, 대구 10월 폭동과 여수순천 반란사건, 제주 4.3 폭동에 연이어, 1950년 들어오면서, 38선 도처에서는 북한 공산군의 크고 작은 기습공격이 그치지 않던 시절, 전쟁보다 회담을 더 중요시하며, 상대방의 말을 잘 믿는 미군 3만여명이 고문단 몇명만 남기고 모두 철수하고나서 불과 두어달도 안되어, 6.25 사변이 일어났읍니다.
남한은 미국만을 너무 믿었었고, 북한은 소련이 계속 함께 싸우며 도와주리라는 말에 속았기에, 백만의 중공군이 임무교대하였으며, 2차대전 후 극빈상태의 일본은 3년간의 한국전쟁 동안 주한미군을 위한 군수산업으로 다시 일어나기 시작하였읍니다. 이제는 중국도 믿을 수가 없게 되었읍니다. 그것은 中國 大人들을 못믿는 것이 아니라, 공산주의 사상을 가진 국가나 단체나 조직이나 조직원의 말이나 주장은 아무 의미가 없어서, 믿을 것이 못되기 때문입니다.
요사이 중국이 입버릇처럼 내세우는 [평화협정]의 본 의도를 모른 척하고 관심을 갖는 얼간이들은 중공의 모택동 공산당 전략, 즉, 공산당의 평화전략과 월남 패망의 역사를 모르는 이들이다. 미국과 월맹 간의 파리 평화회담이 마침내 결실되어, 1973년 [파리 평화협정]이 체결되자, 전 세계의 환영을 받았고, 미군은 철수하기 시작하였다. 안전장치로서, 평화협정과 미군 철수 후, 또 다시 먼저 공격하는 쪽(월맹과 베트공)에 대하여는 세계 5 대강국들(미.소.영.중.불)이 선전포고 없이, 즉시 반격하기로 되어 있었으나, 막상 미군철수와 동시에 월맹의 진격으로 사이공은 함락되고, 수십만명의 보-트 피풀이 아우성치는 비극이 일어났어도, 다시 반격하는 강국은 없었다. 당시 월남국민들 중에 지배적이던 공짜 자유와 공짜 평화의 정신자세가 열강들의 재반격을 포기하게 하였다. 하늘은 스스로가 먼저 자신을 돕지 않는 사람들을 도울 수가 없기 때문이다. 따라서 월맹과 베트공의 공격으로 마침내 월남의 수도 사이공이 1975년 함락되면서 ,월남이라는 나라는 지구상에서 영원히 사라지고 공산화되었다.
그런데, 지난 반세기 동안, 위대한 大韓民國을 貧村에서 이만큼 再建한, 건설의 훌륭한 [새마을 運動家들]을 하나 하나 모두, 없는 흠집이라도 만들어 내서라도, 묻어버리고 잊혀지게 하고자, 광난의 혁명풍으로 대도시 파괴 뿐인 [헌마을 運動人들]을, 심지어 貧者와 弱者로까지 僞裝시켜서 내세워, 각계 각층에 끼어들어, 철면피하게 발광하며 동분서주하게 하는 이 시대에, 민족 수치의 이 시대 역사 현장과 시국을, 우리는 더 이상 언제까지 수수방관만 해야 한단말인가 ? ! 국가의 존망과 국민의 생사가 일시에 갈리고, 유구한 역사민족, 大韓民族의 자멸을 초래할 수도 있는 가공할 핵전쟁!, 대재앙의 먹구름 아래서, 우리는 통회하는 마음으로 성모님께 매달려야 하겠읍니다.
이번에는 장난이나 연습만으로 끝날 것 같지 않아 보입니다.! 특히, 적대적 국가들의 찬성을 받아 국방시설을 하는 나라가 어디 있으며, 군사시설을 세계 만민에게 공개하는 나라들도 있는지?! 중국과 북한과 소련과 일본은 우리나라의 찬성을 얻어, 무력을 개발하고 증강하고 있는지?! 일부 언론인들은 언론자유의 이름으로 조국의 국방을 흔들어도 되는지? 국방이 약하고, 국방없는 나라가 국가를 수호할 수 있는지!? 보도의 자유는 그 결과에 대한 공익의무가 전제된 권리가 아닌가? 오늘의 현실이 기가 막힙니다!
이러한 시국에 신도들은 촛불 들고 모여서 교회의 천상 어머니이신 성모님과 함께 나라와 겨레를 위하여 천주님께 기도하지 않는다면,,,! 북한의 수소폭탄 개발 실험과 대륙간 유도탄 실험발사로, 미국의 최신 핵무기 탑재 항공기들과 군함들이 한반도로 집결하고 있는 현상이 연일 tv 화면을 장식하여, 전 세계가 놀라며 걱정하고 있읍니다. 몇해 전, [서울 불바다] 방송이 거듭되던 시절, 발표했던 내용을 간추려서 수정하여 다시 한번 읽어봅니다. [서울이 불바다]가 되면, [평양도 잿더미]가 된다는데! 참으로 해서는 안 될 말들이 함부로 쉽게 연일 계속되고 있었읍니다 ! 도대체 서울에는 누가 살고 있길래 ?! 어느 민족이 그렇게 많이 살고 있길래,! 걸핏하면 [서울 불바다化]를 거론하며, 실로 소름이 끼치도록 끔찍하게 목청을 돋구며 야단인가?! 천이백만이 넘는 서울 시민 중에 미운 외국인들이 서울에 몇 명이나 된다고 그러는지 ? 우리민족끼리 서로 대량학살을 하자는 것인지!?
일찍이 지난 1950년 6. 25.사변 때는, 소련과 중공이 미공군한테 제공권을 빼앗겨서 평양이 서울보다 몇 배 훨씬 더 잿더미가 되었었다는 역사를 남북 모두가 잊었는지? 불행히도 또 다시 남북전쟁이 난다면, 이 번에도, 현재도, 북한과 중국은 미공군의 제공권을 빼앗을 것으로 생각되지 않습니다. 그러므로, 무슨 희생을 지불하더라도, 북한과 중국은 미국과의 전쟁만은 피해야만 할 것입니다. 미국과 싸워서, 히틀러의 독일도, 소화천황의 일본도, 세계적인 강국들이 이긴 나라가 없읍니다. 특히, 惡談이나 詛呪나 暴言은 言語暴力으로, 개인들 간에도 형사범죄인데 ! 더구나 국가들간에야,,,!
더욱이 사랑을 말하고 실천하려는 종교인들도 자기네 나라와 마을과 가정을 침탈하는 자들이 타민족이든 동족이든간에, 이러한 적들의 총구 앞에 우리 모두가 비무장으로 나란히 서서 죽어주어야 할 의무가 있는지!? 그것은 종교적 사랑이 아니기 때문입니다 ! 타민족 뿐 아니라, 아무리 동족이라도 어느 나라나 강도와 절도는 처벌하며, 살인자들은 엄벌합니다.
[불바다]니. [잿더미]니, 하고 싸우며 난투극을 벌여도, 그래 봐야, 삼천리 강산을 강대국들의 [신무기 시험장]으로 만들 뿐이고, 강대국들의 초현대적 [신무기 대목장]이 열리는 [신무기 장마당]이 되게 하는 것뿐이 아닐까? 그래도, 무력에 의한 남북 점령통일은 마음먹은대로 그리 쉽지 않고, 이조차도 더욱 멀어지고, 또다시 동족상잔의 유혈사태 홍수가 그치고나면, [휴전선의 이동]으로 끝나는, [제2의 6.25 사변 再版]이 될 뿐일 텐데 !
핵무기 보유에 대한 북한의 고집은 남한과 일본과 대만 등의 핵무장을 강요하는 빌미를 주며, 북한동포들의 가난을 더욱 장기적으로 심화시켜, 북한을 극동의 제2 큐바 처럼 만드는 길이 될 뿐이니, 사실 핵무기 보유는 권력과 체제유지나 통일에 아무런 도움도 되지 않는 百害無益한 것입니다. 핵무기 보유 덕택으로 국가경제가 발전한 나라는 없읍니다! 미움과 기피의 위험하고 불행한 대상국가들이 될 뿐입니다. Denuclearization Movement of war weapon !
Nagasaki, after bombardment of atomic bomb by B-29 fighter-bomber, A.M. 11:00 hours of the 9th, August 1945! There was only 1 country, United States, that could use the atomic bombs 70 years ago, when the world war II was terminated by only 2 atomic bombs. 舊 소련 공산당 정권이 핵무기가 없어서 무너진 것은 아닙니다. 이태리를 비롯한 유롭의 여러 작은 나라들이 핵무기가 없다고 망하지는 않고 있읍니다. 미국을 유지시키는 것도 군사력이나 경제력이나 특히 핵무기 보유 덕택은 아니고, 미국의 國民意識, 國民精神, 특히 自由와 正義와 眞理와 良心이 상식과 愛國心과 함께 아직은 어느 정도 그래도 살아있는 미국사회의 국민의식 수준과 합리적인, [국민정신 자세 紀綱] 덕택이라고 봅니다. 체제유지는 자유가 보장된 愛國心이 있는 자발적인 국민들에 의한 것이기 때문입니다. 이제 전 세계 인류는 自由와 正義와 眞理의 사회 안에서만 살 수 있는 시대가 되고 있습니다. 自由가 없는 곳에는 正義도 있을 수 없고, 眞實도 없으며, 진정한 종교도, 자유로운 신앙도 있을 수 없읍니다. 中東의 민주화 熱風은 사실상, 極東에서부터 불기 시작한 東風입니다. 불행이도 아직도 잔존하는 無神論 共産主義 思想으로 인하여 북한도, 중국도, 이제는 現代化한 人類의 자유문화 차원에서 뒷북치는 100여년 전의 꼴찌 자리에 머물게 되었읍니다. 그러나 미래사회는, 아니, 지금도, 세계 인류는 결코 피할 수 없는 [自由化 時代]로 들어가고 있읍니다. 우리 모두는 전쟁이나 유혈사태라도 일어나서 북한이 갑자기 망하여 되는 통일을 원치 않고, 다만 북한사회가 즉시 망하기를 바라지 않고, 한시 바삐 조속히 북한사회가 빨리 달라지기를 바라고 기도해야 합니다. 오늘의 북한이 달라지기 전에는, 항복이 아닌, 통일노력은 무의미하고, 불가능하게 보입니다. 무력이나 경제력 때문이 아니라 思想 때문입니다. 북한사회의 現代化는 경제적인 건설면 보다도, 精神的이며 思想的이며 意識的인 [自由化]차원에서 먼저 이루어져 나가야만 할 것입니다. 우리 모두는 전쟁이나 유혈사태라도 일어나서 북한이 갑자기 망하여 되는 통일을 원치 않고, 다만 북한사회가 즉시 망하기를 바라지 않고, 한시 바삐 조속히 북한사회가 빨리 달라지기를 바라고 기도해야 합니다. 오늘의 북한이 달라지기 전에는, 항복이 아닌, 통일노력은 무의미하고, 불가능하게 보입니다. 무력이나 경제력 때문이 아니라 思想 때문입니다. 북한사회의 現代化는 경제적인 건설면 보다도, 精神的이며 思想的이며 意識的인 [自由化]차원에서 먼저 이루어져 나가야만 할 것입니다. 한마디로, 북한사회가 전 세계에서 가장 뒤떨어진, 가장 부끄러운 20 여만명에 달한다는 탈북자 소식이나, 수준이하의 대부분 동포들의 비참한 가난과, 너무나 不自由스러운 억압사회로 머물러 있지 않도록, 북한 동포들도 自由民主主義로 自力, 自立, 自治 精神으로, 굳세고, 바르고, 용감하게 살아나가도록, 우리는 힘껏 正直하고 眞率하게, 또 용감하게 윤리적으로 도와야 할 것입니다. 남한의 일부 지성인들과 종교인들까지 잘못된 유물주의 고대사상에 물이 들어, 우리 신앙인들까지도 정직하지 못하고, 진솔하지 못하게 말해서는 않됩니다.
그리하여 북한사회도 近代化를 향한 개혁을 위하여, 무혈혁명으로 現代化를 위한 연착륙이 가능하도록, 마치 모든 분야에서, 이른 바, 소련의 고르바쵸푸가 외치던, “페테스트로이카(改革)”나, 전후 월남의, "도이 모이(혁신)"운동을 부르짖던 양심과 애국심을 본받아, 북한 지성인들도 한시바삐 개방과 개혁의 길로 첫 발을 내딛도록, 우리는 힘껏 바르고 참된 말을 거듭하여 지원하며 기도해야 합니다. 물질적인 면보다는 정신적으로, 특히, 윤리적으로 정직하고 진솔하게 말하며 후원해야 합니다.! 이러한 시국에 성당마다 신도들이 촛불 들고 모여서 나라와 겨레를 위하여 기도하지 않는다면,,, ! 또한, 그러기 위해서는 남한의 정치인, 언론인, 교육가, 종교인, 법조인, 예술인, 등, 知性人들이 북한사회 현실에 대한 言行에 있어서, 보다 正直하고 眞率하게 말해야 합니다. 不當한 제도와 非人間的 참혹한 人權 現實에 대하여, 분명하고 용감하게 알려야만 합니다. 우리 교우들은 북한 현실에 대하여 침묵할 의무가 없고, 침묵할 권리가 없음니다. 우리에게 침묵해야 할 의무가 있다면, 우리는 비겁한 하수인이거나, 침묵할 권리가 있다면, 우리도 잘못된 같은 길 위에서 함께 거닐고 있는 동료들이나 공범자들입니다. 침묵은 묵인이고, 동조이므로, 공범의 책임을 면하기 어려운 것이 사실입니다.
아직도 북한에는 천주교 교구장 주교의 사목지침을 따르는 진정한 성당이 하나도 없고, 사제도 없으며, 수녀도 없고, 성직자들의 거주나 입국이 불가능합니다. 해방 직 후만 해도, 50여개소의 천주교 성당들과 5만여명의 천주교 신도들이 있던 북한 지역이었읍니다.! 지금 소련과 중국에도 성당들이 있고, 신도들과 사제들이 있는데,,,! 종교적 신앙의 자유는 인권 신장의 척도입니다.
침묵은 바로 묵인이오, 동조며, 共犯이 될 수도 있으니, 천주교 신앙부재 북한의 참혹한 현실에 관하여는 철저한 벙어리가 되어버린 남한의 일부 知識人들이, 자유와 풍요가 세계 선진국 수준인 남한 사회에 관하여는 達辯의 억지 비판을 넘어, 반대와 방해를 일삼으며, 심지어, 위대한 선진화 경제대국, 우리나라 대한민국을 증오하고, 敵對視하며, 國力을 瓦解시키고, 無力化시키는 일에까지 후안무치하게 나서며, 쌍지팡이를 짚고 난리를 치는, 일부 남한의 지성인들이 있는 것은 대단히 개탄스러운, 실로 너무나 正直하지 못한 처신으로, 良識(양심과 상식)의 함량미달이 아닐 수 없읍니다. 한마디로 북한 사회의 진실에 대하여 우리 知性人들의 비겁한 침묵으로 북한사회가 얼마나 개선되고 있으며, 북한의 핵무기 개발이 얼마나 억제되고 있으며, 나아가 북한의 핵무기 개발 포기 가능성이 얼마나 증가되고 있으며, 전쟁이 어떻게 얼마나 예방될 수 있는지? 오히려, 북한의 핵무기 개발과 발전 실험으로 강대국들의 신무기들이 집합하여 신무기 대목장이 열리고 있지 않은지 !? 북한의 自由化와 民主化에 무관심한 우리의 침묵이 현실개선에 무슨 도움을 주고 있는지? 또, 自由不在 사회가 지속되는 현실에서, 일부 종교인들과 지성인들까지 철저히 침묵하는 것이 무슨, 어떠한 결과를 내고 있는지, 깊히 생각해 보지 않을 수 없읍니다. 이러한 시국에 살고 있으면서, 기도하지 않고, 침묵하는 종교인들은 신앙을 포기한 신도들이고, 진리의 종교인들이라고 할 수 없읍니다.!
이러한 시국에 성당마다 교우들이 촛불 들고 모여서 나라와 겨레를 위하여 기도하지 않는다면, 언제, 그 어떤 경우에, 기도해야 하겠읍니까 ?! 전쟁은 비참한 파괴의 [헌마을운동]이니, 대도시를 건설한 선조들의 [새마을운동]의 피땀을 불사르는 민족사적인 비극입니다.
우리 모두가 自由의 殉敎者, 正義의 勇士, 眞理의 宣言者로서 소박하고 진솔한 信仰人들이 되어 살다가 죽을 수 있기를 원하고 바라는 마음을 가지고, 날마다 정성껏 기도하며 살아갑시다 ! (We are Martyrs of freedom, Warriors of justice, and, Speakers of truth ! ) 오늘의 이 위대한 大韓民國을 再建한,[새마을 運動家들]을 없이하려고, [헌마을 運動人들]이 나타나서, 심지어 貧者와 弱者로까지 僞裝하고, 각계 각층에 끼어들어, 철면피하게 발광하며, 동분서주하는 시대가 되었읍니다. 민족 수치의 역사 현장과 시국을, 우리는 더 이상 언제까지 수수방관만 해야 한단말인가 ? !!!
이러한 시국에 성당마다 교우들이 촛불 들고 모여서, 나라와 겨레를 위하여 기도하지 않는다면, 언제, 그 어떤 경우가 와야, 기도하겠다는 것입니까 ?! 우리 모두가 自由의 殉敎者, 正義의 勇士, 眞理의 宣言者로서, 진정한 信仰人들이 되어 살면서, 교회의 어머니이신 성모님과 함께, 천주 성부님께서 진노를 거두시도록, 겸손하고 진솔한 기도를 바치며, 죽을 수 있게 되기를 기도합시다!
오늘의 人類는 전 세계 도처에서, 서로 크고 작은 집단학살(集團虐殺)을 일삼다가 마침내 집단자살(集團自殺)의 수단으로 집단자폭(集團自爆)으로 가고 있는 것이 아닌가?! 주님,우리나라를 보살펴 주시고, 우리겨레를 불쌍히 여기소서!
Maria, Auxillium Christianorum,Ora pro nobis!
<이번 주 풍경소리. No. 47. 2011-03-01.4:35, [서울이 불바다]가 되면, [평양도 잿더미]가 된다는데! /
이번 주 풍경소리. No. 282, 2015. 8. 11. 국무총리를 대통령 전권특사로 임명, 9월 초, 중국의 항일승전기념일 행사에 참석케 함이 차라리,,,.!참고> Msgr.Byon.
신앙은 칼보다 강하고, 하느님은 핵폭탄도 돌덩이로 만드실텐데!! 核爆彈보다 無神論 共産主義 思想을 먼저 더 憂慮하며 祈禱해야!! 天主信仰만이 最强의 非核必勝의 武器!! 天主信仰人들이 너무나 極少數인 北韓과 日本,中國에 天主信仰 있어야 亞細亞에 戰雲이 사라질텐데! 北韓.中國.日本의 福音化는 大韓信仰人들의 使命이고 特恩! 韓.中.日은 大韓信仰人들의 殉敎現場이고 殉敎刑場! 平和統一에는 殉敎信仰이 最于先 必要不可缺의 武器! Denuclearization Movement of war weapon !
We are all,martyrs of freedom,warriors of justice,Speakers of truth !
-Voice of Chon Jin Am-
Denuclearization movement of war-weapon ! 人類 破滅의 戰爭武器 非核化運動은 오늘날 우리 全 人類의 共同 最大 急先務입니다. 經濟發展만이 國家存立의 唯一한 目的은 아닙니다. 領土擴張 위해 他國占領과 破壞와 他國民 大量殺傷은 過去史에서나 있었던 强大國들의 存在方式이며 目的이었습니다. 核武器 自體도 危險하고 可恐한 것이지만, 核武器를 保有하고 使用하는 人間集團의 倫理觀과 價値觀이 더욱 問題視됩니다. 北韓核이 解決되어 韓半島의 非核化가 되지 않으면, 日本의 核武裝 豫防이 不可能하고, 나아가서, 中國의 核武裝 解除가 더 極難해지며, 美.蘇와 全世界 各國의 核武器 除去역시 不可能해지므로, 人類는 自滅의 길로 갈 수 밖에 없습니다. 不幸하게도 韓半島에서 核戰爭이 勃發하면, 極東 亞細亞 大戰이 不可避하며, 第三次 世界 核大戰으로 擴大될 수 밖에 없습니다. 人類의 核戰爭 出發 舞臺가 되는 韓.中.日이 最大의 被害國으로서, 政權도, 國民도, 文化도, 文明도, 모두 사라지게 될 것입니다. 雙方어느 편이든지, 核武器, 특히 核爆彈을 使用하기 前에, 먼저 經濟爆彈을 使用할 수 있음을 恒常 念頭에 두어야 할 것입니다. 人類의 武器 非核化를 위하여, 眞理와 正義와 自由를 지키고 아끼고 가꾸는 모든이가 娛樂과 遊興과 奢侈와 享樂을 멀리하고, 특히, 信仰人들은 聖母님과 함께 一心同體가 되어 每日 天主님께 祈禱해야 합니다 ! Homo homini lupus est ! 사람을 잡아먹는 것은 시랑이 떼가 아니라, 바로, 사람들이다 !-로마 대제국 옛 政街의 격언).Veritas semper universalis et concreta, justitiaque in libertate !<眞理와 正義와 自由는 恆常 어디서나 普遍的이며 具體的입니다! - Msgr. Byon
<1994년 5월 25일, “이달의 천진암” 제12호 3면 >
Les armes nucléaires de grandes puissnces
De nos jours, en fabriquqnt et en possédqnt les armes nucléaires, les pays puissants menacent les petits pays faibles voire même l'humanité tout entière. Etre un pays puissant signifie déjà en soi avoir une arme la plus forte, et, sans mê̂me posséder d'arme necléaire, n'avoir pas à craindre d'être menacé. Le lion et le tigre n'ont d'autres armes que leur force et leur férocité. Le fait d'ê̂tre fauve levient l'arme la plus redoutable. Par contre, les petits animauxfaibles ont besoin d'un système de protection. Par exemlle, la mouffette sécrète et projette, comme moyen de défense, un liquide d'une odeur infecte. C'est une question inéluctqble de survie. Ainsi, dans les petits pays faibles, l'idée de posséder des armes nucléaires pourrait provenir de leur état de nécessité. Surtout, dans u pays comme la Corée qui a enduré des grurres d'invasion au cours ded son histoire : du continent, elle a eu l'invasion chinoise (Byung-Ja-Ho-Ran), de l'océan, elle a eu l'invasion japonaise(Im-Jin-Oué-Ran). En toute franchise, en tant que descendants des survivants de telles guerres implacables et prévoyant la réunification de la Corée, il nous est difficile de repousser la tentation de posséder des armes nucléaires. Mais en réalité ce sont des pays puissants qui possèdent ces armes et, à leur profit en menaçant les petits pays.
Comme les enfants apprennent le mensonge et l'injure auprès des adultes, les pays faibles sont infectés d'une maladie contagieuse ; l'envie de posséder l'arme nucléaire. Ils tentent d'imiter leurs prédécesseurs. Les pays puissantsdevrqient se rendre compte de tout cela et assumer leur responsabilité. Il est donc équitable que les petits pays puissent effectuer de façon régulière l'inspection des armes nucléaires en commençant d'abord dans les pays puissants. Mê̂me si de petites nations possèdent ces armes dangerruses, elles ne pourrqient, en aucun cas, occper des pays puissants. Comme on dit : "Rien n'est si contagieux que l'exemple", pour ce qui est de la suppression des armes necléaires, les pays puissants devraient se montrer comme un exemple à suivre.
Or, en ce moment, les hommes politiques du monde, que ce soient ceux des grandes puissances ou ceux des pays faibles, nous semblent vénérant comme Dieu, en les considérant comme l'objet de notre dernier recours. Sans doute, les effets de l'arme atomique seraient effroyables. Mais elle n'est ni si puissante et ni si utile que nous le pensions. Autrement dit, elle ne peut prolonger le maintien d'un régime dictatorial ni porter secours aux pays pauvres ; elle n'est purement et simplement que neusible. Du plus, nous pourrions nous poser des questions sur l'efficqcité. des armes necléaires pour la défense nationale de chaque pays. Prenons l'exemple de l'ancien U.R.S.S. : s'est-elle écroulée parce qu'elle n'avait pas d'armes necléaires? N'est)elle pas dans la misère complète? Ou est-ce parce que ses armes nucléaires étaient moins nombreuses et moins puissantes que celles des Etats-Unis? Et en conséquence est-ce grâce àleurs armes atomiques que les américains ont accomli leur expansion économique, tout en sauvegardant un régime démocratique?
La Russie et la Chine vivraient largement mieux que maintenant, si elles ne s'étaient pas tant livrées à la recherche nucléaire. De mê̂me les Etats-Unis et d'autres puissances démocratiques auraient pu contribuer plus à la prospérité de l'humanité et vivraient encore mieux aujourd'hui, s'ils ne s'adonnaient pas tant à recherche necléaire. En fait, la possession des armes nucléairs par ded petits pays ne peut ê̂tre une menace pour les Etats-Unis. Et cela n'est pas une garantie de stabilité pour leur régime politique, quel qu'il soit. En revanche, cela va accélérer leur effondrement en aggravant le processus d'appauvrissement. En dépit de tout, les politiciens se sont voués entièrement aux armes nucléaires en y investissant de façon insensée, et en y mettant le meilleur d'eux-mêmes. Quel qu'il soit le pays qui se cramponne aux armes nucléaires ne peut que faire partie du groupe des fanatiques. Comment les consciences peuvent-elles rester silencieuses devant un tel abus?
Pour quelle raison la bonne conscience des puissances necléaires se retranchent-elles derrière le mutisme? Les peuples, soi-disant de pays développés vivent en quelque sorte de la vente des armes qui massacrent les peuples pauvres et innocents. Du plus, ils concluent des mqrchés è des prix de rabais avec cet argent malhonnête, gagné par le carnage des innocents. Cillebt be oeyvebt-lis savoir que le café qu'ils boivent ses le sang de peuples faibles, et que le pain qu'ils mangent est la chair de ceuxci?
Les peuples des grandes puissances dirigéés par les fonds venant le la vente des armes, ne sont-ils pas de la mê̂me famille que celle des cambrioleur à main armée? Dans ces pays-là n'existent-ils que les loups sous forme humaine? Que sont-ils done cevenus les intellectuels? Que font-ells les presses de ces pays? Nous pourrions nous demander si tour(politiciens forçant l'achat des armes dangereuses, marchants des armes, les intellectules gardant le silence et vivant sans souci) ont le mê̂me et sont, au fond, est pareils à des loups.
Actuellement, la Corée court terriblement le danger de la guerre à cause des armes nucléaires. Au début, les nord coréeens afirmaient que leur recherche nucléaire serait purement destinée àl'usage industriel. Mais récemment; ils ont laissé entendre un autre son de cloche, en disant : "Nous pouvons transformer Séoul en une mer de feu" pour contrecarrer cette affirmation menaçante, sous le préteste d'empê̂cher une attaque éventuelle du Nord, les Etats-Unis annoncent partout la mise en place de missles en Corée du Sud, comme si cette péninsule était l'un des camps d'entraî̂-nement de l'armée américaine. En l'occurrence, surprise, la Chine don't l'attitude redouble de vigilance à l'égard des américains, se demande si elle n'est pas la vraie cible de ceux-ci.
De ce fait, nous avons l'impression que les puissances occidentales, prenant certaines parties de l'Asie qui font problème, tels que Hongkong, Taiwan; Macao et ainsi aue la Corée du Nord comme tremplin de leurs…, amorcent leur "stratégie de trente ans", qui a pour but de diviser la Chine en plusieurs blocs, de sorte que le grand bouleversement de l'Asie approche rapidement d'un moment à l'autre. Parmi les américaiss, il existe des gesns opposés aux armes nucléaires. De mê̂me parmi les japonais, il zxiste des anti-américais qui ne sont pas communistes. Ainsi, l'opposition au nucléaire est différente de l'anti-américanisme, et l'anti-amzricanisme ne correspond pas au pro-communisme. Or, pour quelle raison, la voix des presses garde-t-elle un silence pesant? Au moment où une mèche, don't la moindre flamme provoquerait un grand trouble en Asie, guette l'occasion de s'enflammer, pourquoi n'entendons nous que les échos lointains et faibles de la presse, qui touche nos oreilles comme des bourdonnements d'insectes mourqnts? Mê̂me si le pouvoir et l'idéologie changent d'un cô̂té à l'autre, que le peuple d'une nation n'est-il pas perpétuel et sa survie n'est-elle pas grandiose?
A présent, nous sommes persuadés que la force capable de transformer la Russie en voie de la démocratisation et de l'humanisation, n'est pas dù aux armes nucléaires des américanis ni à celles d'autres pays démocratiques. Le changement radical en Russie n'est pas fondé non plus sur la compétence diplomatique des grandes puissances occidentales, ni sur leur expansion économique. Plus prfécisément, les armes nucléaires n'ont joué aucun rô̂le dans la transformation de la Russie. En mê̂me temps, la puissance éconmique des pays développés de l'Occident n'a pas pu influencer l'ouverture de la Russie. En réalité, le déséquilibre des forces militaires et économiques ne peut que renforcer la situation d'inégalité et provoquer la guerre entre les pays opposés. Bref, ni l'attitude fermée de la Russie. En se repentant, elle revient dans la bonne direction grâce aux prières des fodèmes et à l'aide de la Sainte Mê̂me. Dieu attendrit le coeur endurci des russes. La transformation de la Russie est pour notre humanité un livre de référence en provenance de Dieu. Par les compétitions sportives et l'utilisation d'armes dangereuses progressent la violence et la force militaire. Beaucoup d'intellectuels restent aveugles quant aux conséquences et à l'influence de ce genre de choses sur développement de la civilisation humaine. Il ne faudrait pas penser comme si la croissance économique était l'unique moyen de survie d'un Etat et mettre tout l'énergie au service du projet de développement éconmique. Il ne faudrait pas non plus dénaturer l'Evangile, en considérant l'Eglise comme une organisation fondée en vue de résoudre loutes sortes de problèmes sociaux. Tout le monde doit reprendre ses esprits. Les pays développés de l'Occident don't le système de sécurité sociale est arrivé au plus haut niveau s'éloignent de plus en plus de Dieu. Qu'est-ce que tout cela signifie?
C'est un fait, derrière le repentir de la Russie, il y a les prières de nombreux fidèles du monde entier. Surtout suivant le conseil du Saint Père, chaque année, plus de six millions de fidèles catholique se rassemblent aux lieux saints comme Fatima, Lourdes et Banneux et prient la Vierge Marie pour le repentir des communistes. C'est précisément grâ̂ce à cesprières ferventes et persévérantes que Dieu a exaucé leurs voeux. La réunification de la Corée également ne serait réalisable d'abord que par la prière et la persévérance dans la prière.
Les armes nucléaires du Nord (si elles existent), ne pourraient en aucun cas contribuer à la réunification de la Corée. Celles des Etats-Unis n'amèneraient pas notre peuple è s'unir de nouveau. Ni l'idéologie communiste de la Corée du Nord, ni la puissance économique de la Corée du Sud ne sont pas capable de réaliser notre rê̂ve : la réunification de notre pays. Que ce soit de notre propre gré ou de la volonté d'autrui, la réunification est encore loin, tant qu'on essaie de l'accomplir par la force militaire ou par le pouvoir de l'argent. Utilisant de tels moyens on pourrait peut-ê̂tre occuper ou annexer un pays, mais rien de plus. Qui ne pourrait distinguer l'apparence de réunification par annexion ou occupation d'avec la réunification, réalisée par la compréhension et l'affection intérieure? Nous y arriverons finalement à l'aide de la Sainte Mère, en priant avec amour dans la sérénité et dans la compréhension pour la réunification de notre peuple.
(Père Pierre Byon Ki-Young, à Chon-Jin-Am, Berceau de l'Eglise catholique en Corée... 1994. 5. May)
|